]> http://archive-sfx.spreadfirefox.com/blog/185144 en http://archive-sfx.spreadfirefox.com/node/25315 <p >You may or may not have heard, but two hackers recently said they had 30 undisclosed vulnerabilities tracked in Firefox, specifically the way it handles JavaScript. Well, today, <a href="http://news.com.com/Hacker+backpedals+on+Firefox+zero-day/2100-7349_3-6122317.html" rel="nofollow">he admitted that he didn't</a>. McCarthy hearings, anyone?</p><p >&nbsp;I'm glad to see this debunked, as I felt it would have really hurt Firefox's image if someone had been able to take advantage of it like that.<br >&nbsp;</p> <div id="nodevote result"><br/><img src="modules/nodevote/star_off.png" /><img src="modules/nodevote/star_off.png" /><img src="modules/nodevote/star_off.png" /><img src="modules/nodevote/star_off.png" /><img src="modules/nodevote/star_off.png" /></div> Mainstream Press Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:54:27 -0700 http://archive-sfx.spreadfirefox.com/node/25017 <p>To avoid it becoming a phishing problem, I propose we do what google<br /> has done, which is gmail.com for anyone, and @googlemail.com for<br /> employees. And if we can't do that, why don't we just make it obvious<br /> that it's a email host instead of an official website, so instead of<br /> @firefox.com, we just use @fmail.com, or @foxmail.com (plus I sort of<br /> prefer those names over the generic @firefox.com, anyway). What do you<br /> think?</p> <div id="nodevote result"><br/><img src="modules/nodevote/star_off.png" /><img src="modules/nodevote/star_off.png" /><img src="modules/nodevote/star_off.png" /><img src="modules/nodevote/star_off.png" /><img src="modules/nodevote/star_off.png" /></div> Spreading Firefox Tue, 05 Sep 2006 21:30:40 -0700